Um….the article below is SERIOUSLY disturbing.  I think this is subject matter that should be discussed in the world of epigenetics.  I just read the article this morning and I’m still in a bit of shock.  This is truly the beginning of potential drastic change in the human species.  We are entering a world where we are no longer utilizing the gifts of natural selection but taking control over nature.

Notice the blue strawberry below.  Look at it closely….does it look or feel natural to you ?  I just reposted this on Facebook and had a few comments about it tasting delicious.  Honestly, I just really don’t care how good it is or isn’t.  The fact that it is cross bred with a Arctic Flounder Fish.  It just sounds WRONG!  Maybe its just me….

I have yet to believe that ANYTHING we create in regards to ANY modern technology would be greater or better than what the Divine or Grand God/Goddess can create.  I feel afraid at the outcome of these changes to our society as a whole and the individual. I see something with this large a change in human kind should have YEARS worth of studies. I don’t even know what else to say at the moment.  Feel free to share your comments or opinions in the bottom.

In Peace,
Rachel

Scientists have come up with a Blue Strawberry by splicing them with Fish genes:

Scientists are genetically modifying strawberries in order to allow them to resist freezing temperatures better. They’re doing it by artificial transfer of genes from a species of fish called the Arctic Flounder Fish. The Arctic Flounder Fish produces an anti-freeze that allows it to protect himself in freezing waters.

They isolated the gene that produces this anti-freeze and introduced it to the strawberry. The result is a strawberry that looks blue and doesn’t turn to mush or degrade after being placed in the freezer. While they’re not in production, research is ongoing. 

_________________________________________________________

___________________________________________________________
World’s first GM babies born

by MICHAEL HANLON, Daily Mail
    The world’s first geneticallymodified humans have been created, it was revealed last night.
    The disclosure that 30 healthy babies were born after a series of experiments in the United States provoked another furious debate about ethics.

    So far, two of the babies have been tested and have been found to contain genes from three ‘parents’.
    Fifteen of the children were born in the past three years as a result of one experimental programme at the Institute for Reproductive Medicine and Science of St Barnabas in New Jersey.

    The babies were born to women who had problems conceiving. Extra genes from a female donor were inserted into their eggs before they were fertilised in an attempt to enable them to conceive.

    Genetic fingerprint tests on two one-year- old children confirm that they have inherited DNA from three adults –two women and one man.

    The fact that the children have inherited the extra genes and incorporated them into their ‘germline’ means that they will, in turn, be able to pass them on to their own offspring.

    Altering the human germline – in effect tinkering with the very make-up of our species – is a technique shunned by the vast majority of the world’s scientists.

    Geneticists fear that one day this method could be used to create new races of humans with extra, desired characteristics such as strength or high intelligence.

    Writing in the journal Human Reproduction, the researchers, led by fertility pioneer Professor Jacques Cohen, say that this ‘is the first case of human germline genetic modification resulting in normal healthy children’.

    Some experts severely criticised the experiments. Lord Winston, of the Hammersmith Hospital in West London, told the BBC yesterday: ‘Regarding the treat-ment of the infertile, there is no evidence that this technique is worth doing . . . I am very surprised that it was even carried out at this stage. It would certainly not be allowed in Britain.’

    John Smeaton, national director of the Society for the Protection of Unborn Children, said: ‘One has tremendous sympathy for couples who suffer infertility problems. But this seems to be a further illustration of the fact that the whole process of in vitro fertilisation as a means of conceiving babies leads to babies being regarded as objects on a production line.

    ‘It is a further and very worrying step down the wrong road for humanity.’ Professor Cohen and his colleagues diagnosed that the women were infertile because they had defects in tiny structures in their egg cells, called mitochondria.

    They took eggs from donors and, using a fine needle, sucked some of the internal material – containing ‘healthy’ mitochondria – and injected it into eggs from the women wanting to conceive.

    Because mitochondria contain genes, the babies resulting from the treatment have inherited DNA from both women. These genes can now be passed down the germline along the maternal line.

    A spokesman for the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority (HFEA), which regulates ‘assisted reproduction’ technology in Britain, said that it would not license the technique here because it involved altering the germline.

    Jacques Cohen is regarded as a brilliant but controversial scientist who has pushed the boundaries of assisted reproduction technologies.

    He developed a technique which allows infertile men to have their own children, by injecting sperm DNA straight into the egg in the lab.

    Prior to this, only infertile women were able to conceive using IVF. Last year, Professor Cohen said that his expertise would allow him to clone children –a prospect treated with horror by the mainstream scientific community.

    ‘It would be an afternoon’s work for one of my students,’ he said, adding that he had been approached by ‘at least three’ individuals wishing to create a cloned child, but had turned down their requests.